Post by nurnobi85 on Feb 12, 2024 3:09:46 GMT -5
Was no employment relationship linked to true cooperativism. There was only one contract, between the defendants, offering labor at a much lower price and without labor rights (pages 207/209). As for the other testimonies given, I point out that I did not see any security in the statements made by the witnesses indicated by the first defendant, especially with regard to what was stated by Mr. Leonardo Lima Mourão (pages 209/210), whose state of mind was not the most pleasant (he answered questions disinterestedly, looked away all the time, was insecure and kept yawning). A testimony that does not deserve the slightest credibility.
He came to fulfill an obligation, but had no talent to perform the role assigned to him. The second witness, Jairo de Almeida Sousa, a professional committed to the first defendant, is one of its managers, acted as a true representative of the cooperative. I have no doubt that there was greater firmness, simplicity Dubai Email List and sincerity in the words of the witnesses listed by the author. Even if my conclusion were different, there would be no element to recognize autonomy in the legal relationship maintained between the parties. But this is not the only, nor the most important question defining the controversy under debate.
From reading the social contract of the first defendant, it is possible to extract, without much effort, that the supply of labor to third parties is its reason for being, its main purpose, whose interests stated there do not necessarily coincide, with the desires of workers who, faced with continuous unemployment and the poverty prevailing in the country, accept the most adverse working conditions. Labor Judge Jorge Vieira, deeply knowledgeable about the cruelest forms of exploitation of human labor in the South of Pará, responsible for the systematic condemnation of “modern” slave owners, in a recent debate in the.
He came to fulfill an obligation, but had no talent to perform the role assigned to him. The second witness, Jairo de Almeida Sousa, a professional committed to the first defendant, is one of its managers, acted as a true representative of the cooperative. I have no doubt that there was greater firmness, simplicity Dubai Email List and sincerity in the words of the witnesses listed by the author. Even if my conclusion were different, there would be no element to recognize autonomy in the legal relationship maintained between the parties. But this is not the only, nor the most important question defining the controversy under debate.
From reading the social contract of the first defendant, it is possible to extract, without much effort, that the supply of labor to third parties is its reason for being, its main purpose, whose interests stated there do not necessarily coincide, with the desires of workers who, faced with continuous unemployment and the poverty prevailing in the country, accept the most adverse working conditions. Labor Judge Jorge Vieira, deeply knowledgeable about the cruelest forms of exploitation of human labor in the South of Pará, responsible for the systematic condemnation of “modern” slave owners, in a recent debate in the.